- From: Jonas Jørgensen <jonasj@jonasj.dk>
- Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 12:02:26 +0200
- To: public-evangelist@w3.org
Karl Dubost wrote: > for example > You can make a valid document, which is completely incorrect for the > semantic, like using a "blockquote" element to indent un text and not > for a citation. IMO such a document cannot be said to be valid. That validator.w3.org doesn't find any errors does not mean that the document is valid, similar to how running a document through your word processor's spell checker is no match for having it proof-read by a person. /Jonas
Received on Friday, 6 September 2002 06:02:28 UTC