- From: Isofarro <w3evangelism@faqportal.uklinux.net>
- Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 10:07:56 +0100
- To: "Austin Govella" <austin@desiremedia.com>
- Cc: <public-evangelist@w3.org>, <list@webdesign-L.com>
----- Original Message ----- From: "Austin Govella" <austin@desiremedia.com> To: "Isofarro" <w3evangelism@faqportal.uklinux.net> Cc: "Thor Larholm" <public-evangelist-w3@jscript.dk>; <Mike.Steckel@SEMATECH.Org>; <public-evangelist@w3.org>; <list@webdesign-L.com> Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 11:08 AM Subject: Re: CSS and Netscape > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Thor Larholm" public-evangelist-w3@jscript.dk > > > > [Significant user base using Netscape 4] > >> Give up Netscape 4 or give up standards. > > > > When it is noticed that a fair chunk of revenue comes from Netscape 4 > > visitors, the above choice is a no-brainer, and standards lose out. Is the > > best way of advocating standards a typical brusque "take it or leave it"? > > Ok. Maybe I'm crazy. But what kinds of designs are you speaking about, the > ones that are impossible to achieve in NS4 using standards? If these designs were possible to do in Netscape 4 using a standards-based approach, then I doubt we would be having this particular discussion. :-)
Received on Monday, 2 September 2002 05:07:16 UTC