- From: Anthony Baker <lists@designforpeople.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 18:00:04 -0700
- To: <public-evangelist@w3.org>
| You mention k10k ... okay I personally think it's icky .. BUT ... look at | the graphically RICH interface there. How on EARTH do you rebuild that AS IT | IS using standards based HTML? IE: no tables! | | Thanks | K. i don't think it would be too difficult -- the k10k uses a lot of graphical titles and other text items, which you can position absolutely on the screen. for html-based text, you could use iframe content blocks, which would allow you to absolutely define both the height and width of the content area. no worrying about stretchy content. and, to support the absolute positioning of all items on the page, you could launch k10k in a separate browser window, with the height and width of the window defined. am pretty sure that they already down browser-sniffing and css stylesheet swapping for netscape and ie users to begin with... who knows... maybe we could get 37 signals to do a "37betterK10K" site for showcasing this. they just did a css/xhtml overhaul of their own site. /anthony anthony baker | aim: meadowlark07 t: 415.441.6819 | f: 415.276.9388 mailto:anthony@designforpeople.org
Received on Thursday, 11 July 2002 20:55:17 UTC