- From: <john.colby@btinternet.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 11:49:54 +0100 (BST)
- To: public-evangelist@w3.org
Thanks Chris I'll digest what you've sent and reply. What I was looking for was not so much the definition as the perception of the term accessibility amongst those who are not part of the loop promoting it - in this case the net savvy, a lot of them with their own websites and/or involved in the production of websites, mostly public sector so come under any disability discrimination legislation (the term in use in the U.K.) If the majority had understood the term I wouldn't be bothered, but as only a third of respondents mentioned anything to do with the term as we understand it, it needs explainaing (as you've done) or exemplifying in other ways. Still working on this one. BTW, the websites to which I referred are public sector John > from: Chris Hubick <chris@hubick.com> formal definition of how /I/ > define and explain the term accessible: > > > Take any document such as a novel, magazine, or newspaper. These <snip /> > facilitates the ability for creation of a mapping from it's structure to > a presentation suitable for a particular viewer - this is accessibility. >
Received on Wednesday, 10 July 2002 06:49:56 UTC