- From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 19:12:17 +0000
- To: "Miles, AJ (Alistair) " <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>, "'public-esw@w3.org'" <public-esw@w3.org>
Hi, There's a subtle distinction between id= and explicit formation of a URIO from a namespace and local name. In the former case, the URI formation rules are used (ala RFC2396, etc.), but in the latter case its simple concatenation. That's what the W3C validator is doing, and that's what seems to be called for by the RDF syntax spec (e.g. section 2.14 ... I need to locate more details, but no time right now). #g -- At 17:10 19/02/04 +0000, Miles, AJ (Alistair) wrote: >Hi, > >Was just reading the weblog article on the rdf:nodeID attribute ><http://esw.w3.org/mt/esw/archives/000034.html>. I read this bit : > >-------------------------------------------------------------- ><rdf:Description rdf:ID="me"> > <foaf:name>Dan Brickley</foaf:Name> ></rdf:Description> > >...if parsed with a base URI of http://example.com/foaf/test1.rdf ...will >generate a single triple: > >http://example.com/foaf/test1.rdf http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name "Dan >Brickley" >-------------------------------------------------------------- > >Shouldn't the subject of the triple be : > >http://example.com/foaf/test1.rdf#me > >? > >Al. ------------ Graham Klyne For email: http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact
Received on Thursday, 19 February 2004 14:56:18 UTC