- From: Miles, AJ (Alistair) <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 16:08:00 +0100
- To: "'public-esw-thes@w3.org'" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
- Cc: "'public-esw@w3.org'" <public-esw@w3.org>
On the basis of the previous discussion on URIs for concepts, I'm going to offer the recommendation to thesaurus owners that they use http: based uris without fragment identifiers as URIs for their concepts. So for example: GEMET thesaurus URI: http://www.eionet.eu.int/GEMET/[version] GEMET concept URIs: http://www.eionet.eu.int/GEMET/[version]/[conceptID] Reason for going with http: based URIs is it seems generally agreed that it is desirable to have the concept URIs directly resolving to something. Reason for going with / and not # is so that the concept ID is included in an http GET request and not lost as it would be if it came after a #. I.e. decision based on purely practical considerations. Anybody want to shoot this down before I approach GEMET (& others) with this? Al.
Received on Friday, 30 April 2004 11:08:46 UTC