- From: Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 20:13:30 +0100 (BST)
- To: "Dickinson, Ian J" <Ian.Dickinson@hp.com>
- cc: "'Libby Miller'" <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>, public-esw <public-esw@w3.org>
thanks Ian. I broadly agree with you. For (b) though, that might work in our favour, as we can put a logo and/or a slogan there. Libby On Fri, 25 Apr 2003, Dickinson, Ian J wrote: > Hi Libby, > > What don't you like about them in particular? > The globe is too visually busy for a background (imho), and if you decrease > the opacity I think you'll lose too much of the important bits (like where > the UK is :-). The map would be OK as a backdrop for the FOAF map if it > was semi-opaque, but (a) it misses out the rest of the world, as you said > yourself, and (b) there's a big blue empty space on the left :-). The > atlantic is just too big** if you keep it to scale, hence my suggestion to > use more of a schematic approach. I guess you need the cartographical > equivalent of an ellipsis, whatever that might be! > > Cheers, > Ian > > ** qv "[the judge] ruled that the guilty party was 'life itself' for failing > to be either beautiful or true" [hhgtg] > >
Received on Friday, 25 April 2003 15:18:38 UTC