- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2002 14:49:45 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- cc: <public-esw@w3.org>
Cool. Reminds me that http://www.w3.org/RDF/translations.html includes an Italian translation of the old Model and Syntax spec. I wonder if as part of outreach efforts we could look into finding folk to update (or create) translations of key RDF/SW specs (and other docs?). I could bring this up in the Semantic Web Coordination Group, since it'd need to fit with RDFCore and WebOnt WG's schedules. I'm not sure what point in the spec lifecycle is best for encouraging tranlations... need to look into precedents, policy etc first. Anyway http://www.xml.it:23456/RDF/REC-rdf-syntax-19990222-it.html is the Italian version of M+S... Dan ps. re stable url for logs, I hope to have esw.w3.org soon for a public Wiki, we could use that namespace for IRC logs too. I prefer not to have publically writeable stuff at http://www.w3.org/* URIs, to avoid confusion... On Sat, 7 Sep 2002, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > > Hi folks, > > We have recently set up an IRC channel as a parallel to #rdfig which is in > Italian. I am not sure how many people reading this list speak Italian, but > the idea is that there are people who do, and who were struggling with RDFIG > in english. If this experiment (and it is still very much that) works, we may > try to repeat it for other languages. > > Some links: > The thing was "chumped" in RDFIG on 5 September: > http://rdfig.xmlhack.com/2002/09/05/2002-09-05.html > > There are two days of logs (quiet, and the logs are hand-edited so badly > formated): http://www.w3.org/People/Charles/rdfit/20020905a and > http://www.w3.org/People/Charles/rdfit/20020906 (my hope is to have a > regularl logging bot on this channel and keep the logs in a predictable > and stable place.) > > Cheers > > Chaals > >
Received on Saturday, 7 September 2002 14:49:46 UTC