Re: FOAF and trust and certificates

On a quick review, it certainly *seems* to be more deployable (in terms of 
additional data to be shipped) than X.509.  I don't know if XKMS would 
change that.

#g
--

At 02:05 PM 10/21/02 -0400, Joseph Reagle wrote:

> >I've always felt that SPKI/SDSI [1] is a very interesting model of
> >security which fits rather nicely with the semantic web:
>
>BTW: After I spoke to DanC about representing SPKI in N3, he created an
>example and policy:
>   http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/test/spki2may.n3

-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>

Received on Monday, 21 October 2002 15:30:08 UTC