- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 10:59:59 -0500 (EST)
- To: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- cc: public-esw <public-esw@w3.org>
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Dave Reynolds wrote: > > The first deliverable in WP 12.1 (open demonstrators - selection of > demonstrators) is now due and I've just uploaded our report to the web site. Nice work! > It is currently at: > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe/reports/open_demonstrators/hp-applications-selection.html > Please let me know if this is the right place or whether it should be moved to > conform to some naming convention. In http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe/reports/ we've put each of the other deliverables in a directory named after the short name for the deliverable. Makes cross-linking from other indices a bit easier. If you could copy yours into a 'chosen_demos_rationale_report' subdirectory, that would be good. I can clean up the other directories if you have any difficulty doing so (remind me, how are you editing the site? jigedit? cvs?). > As noted earlier we actually made some informal notes on quite a few (~60) > existing and proposed semantic web applications in RDF format[*]. The appendix > of this report contains a formatted version of this raw data. Putting the data > in the same document made it a bit large so we've separated the appendix out > into a separate document. Please let me know if you think this is not > appropriate and would prefer some different formatting scheme. Seems OK to me. > Feedback on the report itself is welcome too! One tiny thing that jumped out from a quick skim: s/Wiener/Winer/ I do like the idea of focussing on weblog-style apps. Is nicely nearterm, potential for mass uptake, network effects etc... > What is our procedure for reviewing/accepting deliverables? > I assume uploading to the web site was OK given our open-source stance but I > don't want to subvert whatever "due process" we have/intend to have. There's something of a watch-this-space where better process should live. Checking works in progress into the site is fine... Dan > [*] We'd be happy to have the RDF files (currently one file per entry) and > associated schema public but (a) I wasn't sure on where that sort of stuff > should go on the site layout A subdirectory of the reports dir would be fine. For other misc things, just create a dated directory in the .../sw/Europe/YYYYMM/etc/ tree, eg sw/Europe/200211/appsurvey-data/ and (b) it might be better to do that along with a > web form to allow more contributions to be added but doing that well would quite > a bit of work. Yup
Received on Tuesday, 5 November 2002 11:00:05 UTC