- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 09:41:51 +0100
- To: <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Hi, Thanks everyone for an interesting discussion! I think it captures the most essential points. If I may add, wrt OWL2, indeed it was formally finalized after we had to wrap up the SKOS specs. There are more details about SKOS and OWL in sections 5.2 and 5.4 of this wrap-up paper: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2013.05.001 Also, maybe a relevant blog post from a user back then is https://www.mkbergman.com/944/skos-now-interoperates-with-owl-2/ Finally I could note that Renato's example can also apply to properties, not only to classes: the Library of Congress has a vocabulary of concepts that are dually defined as (OWL) properties: https://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators.html Best, Antoine On 31/01/2024 09:20, Helmut Nagy wrote: > Thanks, that closes the loop for me too ;) > > Helmut Nagy > > COO, Strategic Product Manager > > > > https://mailtasticcdn.azureedge.net/img/images/siglinks/company/02438aa4-230f-43f1-af08-455e9aa5a989/u_logo-OtFrszV7rQ.png <https://cGlFX04.na1.hs-sales-engage.com/Ctc/GD+23284/cGlFX04/Jks2-6qcW69sMD-6lZ3lHW3ZZsHM3kxd-2W98zd4R14n35vW1fxffn6c9hYrW1HK7dR2LC6SVW5ZBLnj2Q96rxW4-CCYZ2cXlg5M9bfT32_r9xW9bkHkq3QwtP3Vb6k002Fvw5XVdwp7-4kvGjhW1NjGPR5gwpN9W2XRWrl4n6XrwW6TgWbf7gRnpGW22DM6C7JS91BW2Q8r0N1SVH86W66CmLw7KNMzFW5HMHs74Sbcv6W8C9d0y8VT6ByV-7Hv18L9-H-W4w9hSP76YY0zf8y68pl04> > > > Aktuell können Sie einige Informationen nicht sehen. Bitte aktivieren Sie externe Inhalte, um die Mail vollständig angezeigt zu bekommen oder klicken Sie hier. <https://cGlFX04.na1.hs-sales-engage.com/Ctc/GD+23284/cGlFX04/JlF2-6qcW8wLKSR6lZ3pmMB20_bj8zp6W1j-tKB6cdzjmN4FJ3NXR3Z82W1dR3681n25dRW4wmrxt7Dv59MN8dzH4DYlQpCW5-Pplk99k4p9W4-3sW34n6PYyW5G3DdQ4T0qgLW9cpcmz70MkGzW4srZPR1nbRt5W2f8j244p65RjW8rXqBr6xX2RSW16_zPj1nm-M5W74gLfS3m-8HpW3hqPmH481MXnW4VF2W_2K1LYtN5bZC2qysw7tW8Cc0c327dG7tW2KdPLV11zJQSW5-XNvt5jpw-lW4lDkqf3bfv36W3-YSsr2zFXdKW2mQ8ct8G055kW4wHNZW2rb4dyN49ymWfQZM-vW3WKFWL10wpF3W7HdYvb1llQ3rf5ZhMx004> > > > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 6:26 AM Renato Iannella <r@iannel.la <mailto:r@iannel.la>> wrote: > > Hi all, thanks for all the responses…I think my current approach (aka puns!) seems consistent. > >> * *There is an expectation that an ongoing OWL revision will alleviate the latter problem by offering some form of metamodeling* >> >> Does anyone have knowledge about the expected OWL revision? > > Yes, Michael’s email referred to: https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-new-features/#F12:_Punning <https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-new-features/#F12:_Punning> > > Cheers - Renato > > Cheers > > frf > > >
Received on Wednesday, 31 January 2024 08:42:23 UTC