- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2018 15:30:06 +0200
- To: <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Hi, The notion of a "SKOS plus" doesn't ring a bell either. There's XKOS that could have a similar remit, though. In fact we had some discussions on whether to re-use the iso-thes extension there... Other areas where I could imagine similar extension principle could be in the area of describing Concept Schemes, in the work of the DCMI NKOS WG, or Bartok, and others. But I don't remember "plus" appearing in these works, either... Cheers, Antoine On 22/04/18 14:49, Thomas Baker wrote: > Hi Fabio, > > On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 02:04:50PM +0200, Fabio Ricci wrote: >> 2016 I introduced “illegally” the concept of SKOS++ in >> https://skosshuttle.ch/tutorials/skosshuttle-skospp.pdf as you >> probably are trying to do now. > > Interesting - I see you defined a SKOS++ project as one that could > define as many custom relations as needed. > >> The ideas can be copied/used at your will, since they are not legally protected. > > Understood. SKOS was always intended to be extensible [1]. The project > I'm describing in my paper, like many others, uses the iso-thes > namespace and coins some custom relation properties. I wanted to see if > others have given such an "extended SKOS" pattern a name. > >> Hope that helped > > Much appreciated! > Tom > > [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/2009/NOTE-skos-primer-20090818/#secskosspecialization >
Received on Sunday, 22 April 2018 13:30:41 UTC