- From: Fabio Ricci <fabio.ricci@semweb.ch>
- Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 17:13:03 +0200
- To: Vladimir Alexiev <vladimir.alexiev@ontotext.com>
- Cc: public-esw-thes@w3.org
- Message-Id: <4C59F76D-D1D3-4A65-A8C3-013C89D6A3C4@semweb.ch>
Hello Vladimir Thank you for your question. In RDFLINK the mapping language is in TURTLE. The advantage in using RDFLINK are more in its service - ready to use: No download, no installation, no bugs (hopefully), Each table can be mapped against several RDFStores using one multi-mapping (in TURTLE). RDFLINK is more than a language, it is a SYSTEM, which generates RDF data. Kind regards / Meilleures salutations / Freundliche Grüsse Fabio Ricci semweb Semantic Web Technologies · Records Management Software systems · ICT coaching · ICT Projects leading https://semweb.ch <https://ch.semweb.ch/> https://skosshuttle.ch <https://skosshuttle.ch/> https://rdflink.ch <https://rdflink.ch/> Weinmanngasse 26 CH-8700 Küsnacht ZH (Switzerland) Tel. +41 (076) 5281961 +39 (389) 0681334 Skype: semweb-llc <applewebdata://FC303AB7-5EE2-4C56-83C3-7FEBBFF0D9FC/%E2%80%9C#%E2%80%9D> Confidentiality Warning: This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the intended recipients, are confidential and maybe privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission, conversion to hard copy, copying, circulation or other use of this message and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return email, and delete this message and any attachments from your system. Thank you. > On 06 Oct 2016, at 16:35, Vladimir Alexiev <vladimir.alexiev@ontotext.com> wrote: > > What is the benefit to use this mapping language, rather than the R2RML standard, for which there are numerous implementations?
Received on Thursday, 6 October 2016 15:13:32 UTC