- From: Osma Suominen <osma.suominen@helsinki.fi>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 09:18:51 +0200
- To: public-esw-thes@w3.org
On 17/01/16 12:29, Antoine Isaac wrote: > I'm actually a bit surprised I couldn't find a trace of an earlier > attempt... Are you perhaps referring to Paul Hermans' series of blog posts from 2010 where he attempted to express some of the SKOS ICs using OWL2 and SPIN? His conclusion at the time was that most of them couldn't be represented in OWL2. The blog is long gone now but the posts are still available thanks to the Internet Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20130522054521/http://www.proxml.be/users/paul/weblog/aaad2/Integrity_constraints_in_SKOS_part_1_.html https://web.archive.org/web/20130522051358/http://www.proxml.be/users/paul/weblog/55d41/Integrity_constraints_in_SKOS_part_2.html https://web.archive.org/web/20130522044951/http://www.proxml.be/users/paul/weblog/bfa21/Integrity_Constraints_in_SKOS_part_3.html https://web.archive.org/web/20130522033512/http://www.proxml.be/users/paul/weblog/0a621/SKOS_part_4_property_chains.html There is also some commentary on the topic on Holger Knublauch's blog (obviously promoting SPIN): http://composing-the-semantic-web.blogspot.com/2010/04/where-owl-fails.html -Osma -- Osma Suominen D.Sc. (Tech), Information Systems Specialist National Library of Finland P.O. Box 26 (Kaikukatu 4) 00014 HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO Tel. +358 50 3199529 osma.suominen@helsinki.fi http://www.nationallibrary.fi
Received on Monday, 18 January 2016 07:19:24 UTC