- From: Svensson, Lars <L.Svensson@dnb.de>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 17:37:07 +0000
- To: Sean Bechhofer <sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk>, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Cc: "public-esw-thes@w3.org" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
On Friday, January 15, 2016 5:37 PM, Sean Bechhofer wrote: > > On 15 Jan 2016, at 15:42, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> wrote: > > > That's exact. > > If you look at the source [1] you will see that S36, along with a number of other > conditions are simply represented using comments. Note that there is also a > “prune” of the SKOS vocab [2] which has further axioms removed in order to > provide an ontology that fits within the OWL1 DL sublanguage and can then be > used by applications that wanted to live within OWL DL. As Antoine points out, > this was all in the context of OWL 1. Do you think it would be possible (and worth the effort) to make it OWL 2-compatible? Best, Lars
Received on Friday, 15 January 2016 17:37:36 UTC