W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-esw-thes@w3.org > January 2016

RE: S36 implementation details

From: Svensson, Lars <L.Svensson@dnb.de>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 17:37:07 +0000
To: Sean Bechhofer <sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk>, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Cc: "public-esw-thes@w3.org" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Message-ID: <24637769D123E644A105A0AF0E1F92EF010D24EAB0@dnbf-ex1.AD.DDB.DE>
On Friday, January 15, 2016 5:37 PM, Sean Bechhofer wrote:
> On 15 Jan 2016, at 15:42, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> wrote:
> > That's exact.
> If you look at the source [1] you will see that S36, along with a number of other
> conditions are simply represented using comments. Note that there is also a
> “prune” of the SKOS vocab [2] which has further axioms removed in order to
> provide an ontology that fits within the OWL1 DL sublanguage and can then be
> used by applications that wanted to live within OWL DL. As Antoine points out,
> this was all in the context of OWL 1.

Do you think it would be possible (and worth the effort) to make it OWL 2-compatible?


Received on Friday, 15 January 2016 17:37:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:46:48 UTC