Re: Integration of preservation vocabularies

OWL has supported punning classes and individuals in DL since 2009 DL, so
that shouldn't be a problem.

Where you might have problems is if a particular vocabulary uses ordered
collections, as that requires the use of rdf: lists, which are not valid in
DL.

You may need to add class declarations for any SKOS concepts that you pun
as classes. The OWLAPI will generally add missing declarations when saving
documents unless you tell it not to, so this isn't a huge problem if you
are using tools like protégé.

Simon