W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-esw-thes@w3.org > December 2016

Re: Integration of preservation vocabularies

From: Simon Spero <sesuncedu@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 15:54:49 -0500
Message-ID: <CADE8KM5gHaMrscD4yp6S=GT1QMVXKsN+XJL4QqCmvFtJux18Jw@mail.gmail.com>
To: bertrand.caron@bnf.fr, SKOS <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
OWL has supported punning classes and individuals in DL since 2009 DL, so
that shouldn't be a problem.

Where you might have problems is if a particular vocabulary uses ordered
collections, as that requires the use of rdf: lists, which are not valid in

You may need to add class declarations for any SKOS concepts that you pun
as classes. The OWLAPI will generally add missing declarations when saving
documents unless you tell it not to, so this isn't a huge problem if you
are using tools like protégé.

Received on Saturday, 10 December 2016 20:55:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:46:51 UTC