- From: Thomas Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
- Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 17:34:53 +0900
- To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Cc: brian.matthews@stfc.ac.uk, public-esw-thes@w3.org
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 06:28:26PM +0200, Antoine Isaac wrote: > Well spotted, and thanks for the corrective action! > Unfortunately now I think we can't change the paper any more. > > On the other hand, it's maybe a problem on the JODI side. http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/ is not working anymore. > And it must have been fairly recent. Publishers check that kind of thing when they edit the last version to be published... Dear all, For the record: the link at [1] for the LIMBER paper now correctly points to [2]. My query revealed a more general problem with links in those JoDI issues, but pending a solution to the more general problem, this specific link has been fixed. For the full context (from last year) see below... Tom [1] http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/article/view/32/33 [2] http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/article/view/34/35 On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 09:39:21AM -0400, Tom Baker wrote: > The paper cites [1], which resolves to a table of contents of the Jodi issue > with abstracts. There is an abstract there, with a link to the Limber paper > ("Having the right connections") [2]. That link resolves to a Jodi page with > the title "Networked Knowledge Organization Systems: introduction to a special > issue", but that page that only provides a link back to [3]. > > By a Google search, I find the February 2001 Jodi article "Having the Right > Connections: the LIMBER Project" at [4]. > > I note that the metadata for Issue 32 [5] gives the identifier of that issue as > [6], which resolves to a Jodi page titled "Networked Knowledge Organization > Systems: introduction to a special issue" and linking back to [3]. > > I find the abstract of "Having the Right Connections at [7] and the metadata > at [8]. > > I find both of these links [1,4] in the notes used for writing the History > section. We (the authors) were pretty careful about clicking on the links in > the proofs, and as Antoine points out, publishers check that sort of thing too. > It is possible that we neglected to try clicking through to [2]. > > I will drop a line to the editors of Jodi suggesting they correct the link on > [1], which currently points to [2] (a broken link), to point instead to [4] (or > its hdl.handle.net equivalent). > > Thank you for flagging this! > Tom > > [1] http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/article/view/32/33 > [2] http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/article/view/32/hdl.handle.net/1969.2/jodi-31 > [3] http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/article/view/32/33 > [4] http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/article/view/34/35 > [5] http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/rt/metadata/32/33 > [6] http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/article/view/32 > [7] http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/article/view/34 > [8] http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/rt/metadata/34/35 > > > > Brian writes: > > >Interesting to see this! > > > > > >For the historically minded, I see that the Limber paper in Jodi is referred to: http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/article/view/32/33 > > >This no longer seems to be available (or not correctly linked), so I have put this into our institutional repository at > > >http://epubs.stfc.ac.uk/work-details?w=28966 > > > > > >(though the paper at this Open University workshop http://epubs.stfc.ac.uk/work-details?w=29055 talked more about the > > >RDF thesaurus at that time, and the full Liimber schema ended up in the SWAD-Europe report http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe/reports/thes/8.2/ ) > > > > > >Thanks > > > > > >Brian > > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > >From: Antoine Isaac [mailto:aisaac@few.vu.nl] > > >Sent: 04 July 2013 17:04 > > >To: SKOS > > >Subject: Paper - key choices in the design of SKOS > > > > > >Dear all, > > > > > >You may be interested in a paper published last month by the Journal of Web Semantics, looking back at many years of work on SKOS: > > >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2013.05.001 > > > > > >Cheers, > > > > > >Antoine > > > > > > > -- > Tom Baker <tom@tombaker.org> -- Tom Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
Received on Monday, 27 October 2014 08:35:36 UTC