- From: Thomas Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
- Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 17:34:53 +0900
- To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Cc: brian.matthews@stfc.ac.uk, public-esw-thes@w3.org
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 06:28:26PM +0200, Antoine Isaac wrote:
> Well spotted, and thanks for the corrective action!
> Unfortunately now I think we can't change the paper any more.
>
> On the other hand, it's maybe a problem on the JODI side. http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/ is not working anymore.
> And it must have been fairly recent. Publishers check that kind of thing when they edit the last version to be published...
Dear all,
For the record: the link at [1] for the LIMBER paper now correctly
points to [2].
My query revealed a more general problem with links in those JoDI
issues, but pending a solution to the more general problem, this
specific link has been fixed.
For the full context (from last year) see below...
Tom
[1] http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/article/view/32/33
[2] http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/article/view/34/35
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 09:39:21AM -0400, Tom Baker wrote:
> The paper cites [1], which resolves to a table of contents of the Jodi issue
> with abstracts. There is an abstract there, with a link to the Limber paper
> ("Having the right connections") [2]. That link resolves to a Jodi page with
> the title "Networked Knowledge Organization Systems: introduction to a special
> issue", but that page that only provides a link back to [3].
>
> By a Google search, I find the February 2001 Jodi article "Having the Right
> Connections: the LIMBER Project" at [4].
>
> I note that the metadata for Issue 32 [5] gives the identifier of that issue as
> [6], which resolves to a Jodi page titled "Networked Knowledge Organization
> Systems: introduction to a special issue" and linking back to [3].
>
> I find the abstract of "Having the Right Connections at [7] and the metadata
> at [8].
>
> I find both of these links [1,4] in the notes used for writing the History
> section. We (the authors) were pretty careful about clicking on the links in
> the proofs, and as Antoine points out, publishers check that sort of thing too.
> It is possible that we neglected to try clicking through to [2].
>
> I will drop a line to the editors of Jodi suggesting they correct the link on
> [1], which currently points to [2] (a broken link), to point instead to [4] (or
> its hdl.handle.net equivalent).
>
> Thank you for flagging this!
> Tom
>
> [1] http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/article/view/32/33
> [2] http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/article/view/32/hdl.handle.net/1969.2/jodi-31
> [3] http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/article/view/32/33
> [4] http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/article/view/34/35
> [5] http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/rt/metadata/32/33
> [6] http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/article/view/32
> [7] http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/article/view/34
> [8] http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/rt/metadata/34/35
>
>
>
> Brian writes:
> > >Interesting to see this!
> > >
> > >For the historically minded, I see that the Limber paper in Jodi is referred to: http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/article/view/32/33
> > >This no longer seems to be available (or not correctly linked), so I have put this into our institutional repository at
> > >http://epubs.stfc.ac.uk/work-details?w=28966
> > >
> > >(though the paper at this Open University workshop http://epubs.stfc.ac.uk/work-details?w=29055 talked more about the
> > >RDF thesaurus at that time, and the full Liimber schema ended up in the SWAD-Europe report http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe/reports/thes/8.2/ )
> > >
> > >Thanks
> > >
> > >Brian
> > >
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Antoine Isaac [mailto:aisaac@few.vu.nl]
> > >Sent: 04 July 2013 17:04
> > >To: SKOS
> > >Subject: Paper - key choices in the design of SKOS
> > >
> > >Dear all,
> > >
> > >You may be interested in a paper published last month by the Journal of Web Semantics, looking back at many years of work on SKOS:
> > >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2013.05.001
> > >
> > >Cheers,
> > >
> > >Antoine
> > >
> >
>
> --
> Tom Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
--
Tom Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
Received on Monday, 27 October 2014 08:35:36 UTC