- From: Jim McCusker <mccusker@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 11:56:21 -0500
- To: "Svensson, Lars" <L.Svensson@dnb.de>
- Cc: "public-esw-thes@w3.org" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 27 February 2014 16:57:10 UTC
I'm not sure what your intended semantics for "including" is: is it exemplars? I would suggest rdfs:seeAlso for "see also", or prov:alternateOf. Jim On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Svensson, Lars <L.Svensson@dnb.de> wrote: > All, > > which is the best way to model "including" and "see also" notes as used in > classifications in skos? For "see also" one could consider skos:related, > but I haven't found anything suitable for "including". > > Thanks for any insight, > > Lars > > *** Lesen. Hören. Wissen. Deutsche Nationalbibliothek *** > -- > Dr. Lars G. Svensson > Deutsche Nationalbibliothek > Informationstechnologie > Telefon: +49-69-1525-1525 > mailto:l.svensson@dnb.de > http://www.dnb.de > > > -- Jim McCusker Data Scientist 5AM Solutions jmccusker@5amsolutions.com http://5amsolutions.com PhD Student Tetherless World Constellation Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute mccusj@cs.rpi.edu http://tw.rpi.edu
Received on Thursday, 27 February 2014 16:57:10 UTC