RE: how to: ordered collection of a Concept

• From: Johan De Smedt <johan.de-smedt@tenforce.com>
• Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2013 10:50:47 +0100
• To: <vladimir.alexiev@ontotext.com>, <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
• Cc: "'Stella Dextre Clarke'" <stella@lukehouse.org>, "'Marcia Zeng'" <mzeng@kent.edu>
• Message-ID: <05c401cedd31$2b2516b0$816f4410$@tenforce.com>

Hello Vladimir,

Can you give an example illustrating the problem and approach you make with equivalentArray?

Thanks,

Kind Regards,

Johan De Smedt 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vladimir Alexiev [mailto:vladimir.alexiev@ontotext.com]
> Sent: Friday, 08 November, 2013 16:43
> To: public-esw-thes@w3.org
> Cc: 'Stella Dextre Clarke'; 'Marcia Zeng'
> Subject: how to: ordered collection of a Concept
> 
> Some AAT *concepts* have ordered children (narrower concepts).
> How can one represent this?
> - I guess one could put the children in a skos:OrderedCollection that is "free floating" i.e. one that’s not
> connected to anything. But TMSes will have a hard time figuring what this pattern means
> - iso:ConceptArray allows you to put ordered children *under* a concept by using
> iso:subordinateArray
> - I propose an extension iso:equivalentArray that puts the array "next" to the concept.
> 
> What do you think?

Received on Saturday, 9 November 2013 09:51:16 UTC