- From: Thomas Francart <thomas.francart@sparna.fr>
- Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 17:28:24 +0200
- To: "Andreas Blumauer (Semantic Web Company)" <a.blumauer@semantic-web.at>
- Cc: SKOS <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAPugn7Xx3h8aZThgPaugnf-TP52M8-Ebh7oxfoo6N_8WK=V8VA@mail.gmail.com>
Yes, sorry, I forgot to mention I looked at the Turtle version at http://vocabulary.semantic-web.at/w3c-linked-data-glossary/export/w3c-linked-data-glossary.ttl . Line 2702 I see : < http://vocabulary.semantic-web.at/w3c-linked-data-glossary/5StarLinkedOpenData> skos:topConceptOf < http://vocabulary.semantic-web.at/w3c-linked-data-glossary/LinkedDataGlossary> . Line 2725 I see : < http://vocabulary.semantic-web.at/w3c-linked-data-glossary/5StarLinkedOpenData> skos:broader < http://vocabulary.semantic-web.at/w3c-linked-data-glossary/LinkedOpenData> . Thomas 2013/7/5 Andreas Blumauer (Semantic Web Company) <a.blumauer@semantic-web.at > > Hello Thomas, > > thanks for your feedback. > I took a look at > http://vocabulary.semantic-web.at/w3c-linked-data-glossary/5StarLinkedOpenData > > > There is no such a contradiction. > > What exactly are you refering to, can you provide a URI instead of text > please? > > Kind Regards, > Andreas > > ------------------------------ > > Hello Andreas > > Thanks for providing the glossary as LOD. > This raises a question : some concepts in this data, like > "5StarLinkedOpenData", are both declared having a skos:broader (in that > case, "LinkedOpenData"), and being "topConceptOf" the concept scheme. Is > this intended ? > > SKOS says about such situations : > > " > The property skos:hasTopConcept is, by convention, used to link a concept > scheme to the SKOS concept(s) which are topmost in the hierarchical > relations for that scheme. However, there are no integrity conditions > enforcing this convention. (...) An application may reject such data but is > not required to. > " > > Should applications that consume SKOS coming from your tool ignore > isTopConceptOf / hasTopConcept to determine root concepts ? > > Thanks > Thomas > > > > > 2013/7/4 Andreas Blumauer (Semantic Web Company) < > a.blumauer@semantic-web.at> > >> Hello, >> >> I thought this could also be interesting for the SKOS list: >> >> http://vocabulary.semantic-web.at/w3c-linked-data-glossary >> W3C's Linked Data Glossary published in SKOS as LOD + SPARQL endpoint. >> >> Kind Regards, >> Andreas >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"Martin Kaltenböck" <m.kaltenboeck@semantic-web.at> >> *To: *"Bernadette Hyland" <bhyland@3roundstones.com> >> *Cc: *"W3C public GLD WG WG" <public-gld-wg@w3.org>, "Andreas Blumauer" < >> a.blumauer@semantic-web.at>, "j jakobitsch" <j.jakobitsch@semantic-web.at >> > >> *Sent: *Thursday, 4 July, 2013 12:54:07 PM >> *Subject: *Re: Linked Data Glossary is published! >> >> Hi Bernadette >> >> many thanks for your feedback on this what is highly appreciated! >> >> We have fetched the W3C LD Glossary now and loaded it into our open / >> public PoolParty Vocabulary (LD) Server - please see: >> <http://vocabulary.semantic-web.at/w3c-linked-data-glossary.html> >> http://vocabulary.semantic-web.at/w3c-linked-data-glossary.html >> >> (btw also other controlled vovabs to be found there: >> http://vocabulary.semantic-web.at/) >> >> Furthermore we have created a few relations as well as we linked the >> relevant terms to DBpedia and the Semantic Web Thesaurus ( >> http://vocabulary.semantic-web.at/semweb.html) >> >> So the current W3C LD glossary is available as SKOS and Linked Data now ;) >> >> What we were wondering is what license the glossary has - in the header >> area the (c) Copyright W3C is mentioned but I think this is a template of >> the whole W3C system? >> BUT: what license to give this LD Glossary (I do think when we speak >> about Open Data we should decide for an open license as CC-o or CC-BY??) >> FYI: at the moment we have used the Glossary URL for license info... >> >> Remark: in principle it would be easy to change the URIs to W3C URIs - >> but then there would be a need to install a PPT on W3C servers / use >> respective domain - if this sounds >> interesting just get in touch with me - sure we could find an interesting >> solution here ;) >> >> >> So all on this list - please feel free to play around - your feedback is >> very welcome - best regards - martin >> >> PS: also created ADMS of the Glossary: >> http://vocabulary.semantic-web.at/w3c-linked-data-glossary/adms/0.2.html >> PPS: for sure there is also an endpoint in place now: >> http://vocabulary.semantic-web.at/PoolParty/sparql/w3c-linked-data-glossary >> PPPS: CCd also 2 colleagues to this email >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"Bernadette Hyland" <bhyland@3roundstones.com> >> *To: *"Martin Kaltenböck" <m.kaltenboeck@semantic-web.at> >> *Cc: *"W3C public GLD WG WG" <public-gld-wg@w3.org> >> *Sent: *Friday, 28 June, 2013 6:15:42 PM >> *Subject: *Re: Linked Data Glossary is published! >> >> Hi Martin, >> <Added GLD WG to thread> >> >> Thanks for the offer and I think expanding LOD resources such as the >> glossary with other LOD (e.g., DBpedia, etc) is a great idea. One idea we >> have is to publish the glossary in w3.org namespace using SKOS and >> following best practices. Then encourage companies like yours to take the >> data and do what you're proposing. One idea would be to link the glossary >> LOD to say PoolParty's entry in the Open Data Directory to showcase your >> product, expanding the virtuous circle. >> >> So I'm very happy you suggested it and am very happy to discuss ideas >> that show LOD in action & showcase open data products & services ... a win >> for everyone. >> >> Cheers, >> Bernadette >> >> >> On Jun 27, 2013, at 4:11 PM, Martin Kaltenböck < >> m.kaltenboeck@semantic-web.at> wrote: >> >> Hi Bernadette, >> >> hope you are doing well?! >> >> Congrats for this work, great step for LOD... >> >> SWC would still be willing to contribute a free cloud service of >> PoolParty PPT Thesaurus server to bring this glossary to SKOS easily >> including concept URIs, an endpoint to query & thereby enable re-use as >> well as linking capability, so concepts could be linked to other sources as >> DBpedia beside others...so publishing the LD Glossary as LOD... >> >> What do you think? >> >> Looking forward to hearing from you on this again! >> >> Best regards! >> >> Martin >> >> >> >> Martin Kaltenböck, CMC >> Managing Partner, CFO >> Semantic Web Company >> >> Web: http://semantic-web.at >> Blog: http://blog.semantic-web.at >> Meta Data Management: http://poolparty.biz >> Phone: +43 1 402 12 35 - 25 >> >> >> >> Am 27.06.2013 um 17:09 schrieb Bernadette Hyland < >> bhyland@3roundstones.com>: >> >> >> Hi, >> On behalf of the editors, I'm pleased to announce the publication of the >> peer-reviewed *Linked Data Glossary* published as a W3C Working Group >> Note effective 27-June-2013.[1] >> >> We hope this document serves as a useful glossary containing terms >> defined and used to describe Linked Data, and its associated vocabularies >> and best practices for publishing structured data on the Web. >> >> The LD Glossary is intended to help foster constructive discussions >> between the Web 2.0 and 3.0 developer communities, encouraging all of us >> appreciate the application of different technologies for different use >> cases. We hope the glossary serves as a useful starting point in your >> discussions about data sharing on the Web. >> >> Finally, the editors are grateful to David Wood for contributing the >> initial glossary terms from Linking Government Data<http://www.springer.com/computer/database+management+%26+information+retrieval/book/978-1-4614-1766-8>, >> (Springer 2011). The editors wish to also thank members of the Government >> Linked Data Working Group <http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/> with special >> thanks to the reviewers and contributors: Thomas Baker, Hadley Beeman, >> Richard Cyganiak, Michael Hausenblas, Sandro Hawke, Benedikt Kaempgen, >> James McKinney, Marios Meimaris, Jindrich Mynarz and Dave Reynolds who >> diligently iterated the W3C Linked Data Glossary in order to create a >> foundation of terms upon which to discuss and better describe the Web of >> Data. If there is anyone that the editors inadvertently overlooked in this >> list, please accept our apologies. >> >> Thank you one & all! >> >> Sincerely, >> Bernadette Hyland<http://3roundstones.com/about-us/leadership-team/bernadette-hyland/>, >> 3 Round Stones <http://3roundstones.com/> >> Ghislain Atemezing <http://www.eurecom.fr/%7Eatemezin>, EURECOM<http://www.eurecom.fr/> >> Michael Pendleton, US Environmental Protection Agency<http://www.epa.gov/> >> Biplav Srivastava, IBM <http://www.ibm.com/in/research/> >> >> W3C Government Linked Data Working Group >> Charter: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/ >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/ld-glossary/ >> >> >> >> >> > > > -- > * > * > *Thomas Francart* - Sparna > Consultant Indépendant > Data, Sémantique, Contenus, Connaissances > web : http://sparna.fr, blog : http://francart.fr > Tel : +33 (0)6.71.11.25.97 > Fax : +33 (0)9.58.16.17.14 > Skype : francartthomas > > > -- * * *Thomas Francart* - Sparna Consultant Indépendant Data, Sémantique, Contenus, Connaissances web : http://sparna.fr, blog : http://francart.fr Tel : +33 (0)6.71.11.25.97 Fax : +33 (0)9.58.16.17.14 Skype : francartthomas
Received on Friday, 5 July 2013 15:29:12 UTC