- From: Jakob Voss <jakob.voss@gbv.de>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:20:28 +0100
- To: SKOS <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Hi Alistair, you wrote: > I'm still conscious that there isn't a really good way to find out about what > extensions and design patterns have been proposed and discussed within this > community, and that makes it harder to build consensus and avoid re-inventing > the wheel. The wiki could work, but takes some editorial work to keep updated, > and it's hard to guage consensus. I've been thinking recently that a website > that works a bit like stack overflow, but where you can post a design pattern > or extension to SKOS and have others vote for/against and comment, would be > a lovely tool ... anyone feel like making it happen? :) Then why not directly use http://www.semanticoverflow.com/? It is already used to ask and discuss about SKOS: http://www.semanticoverflow.com/questions/tagged/skos Further you can mark some questions as "community wiki", which all can edit. Sure there are also arguments for yet another self-managed site, but I am not the one who wants to maintain it ;-) I only asked at this list, because I think that the main SKOS community lurks around here instead of watching http://www.semanticoverflow.com/feeds/tag/skos Cheers Jakob -- Jakob Voß <jakob.voss@gbv.de>, skype: nichtich Verbundzentrale des GBV (VZG) / Common Library Network Platz der Goettinger Sieben 1, 37073 Göttingen, Germany +49 (0)551 39-10242, http://www.gbv.de
Received on Friday, 14 January 2011 15:21:08 UTC