- From: Armando Stellato <stellato@info.uniroma2.it>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 19:00:31 +0100
- To: "'Bob DuCharme'" <bob@snee.com>, <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Dear Bob, I'm working as a consultant for FAO on porting AGROVOC and other FAO vocabularies to SKOS-XL (the new version will be added very soon to the linked-data cloud). There are already URIs for AGROVOC (from a past version available in OWL) though, for referring to semantically-matching concepts from other thesauri available in FAO which won't be probably ported to RDF, instead of generating URIs for them too and then linking 'em through skos mapping properties, we will use subproperties of skos:notation to report their codes with respect to each of the old thesauri. This way, we will keep in the new RDF version of AGROVOC links to all legacy DBs of other thesauri As an example: :an_agrovoc_uri :asfaCode "asf4523"^^:ASFACode :asfaCode rdfs:subPropertyOf skos:notation Following SKOS best-practices, we will probably define many subproperties of skos:notation (and non-xsd datatypes) as the number of available thesauri to be referenced Cheers, Armando > -----Original Message----- > From: public-esw-thes-request@w3.org [mailto:public-esw-thes- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Bob DuCharme > Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 6:23 PM > To: public-esw-thes@w3.org > Subject: usage of skos:notation? > > Dave Reynolds recently pointed me to the first examples I've seen of > the > skos:notation property being used. Has anyone else seen it used much? > > thanks, > > Bob > > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2011Jan/0062.html
Received on Monday, 10 January 2011 18:01:41 UTC