- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 12:44:33 +0200
- To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Cc: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>, "public-esw-thes@w3.org" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
On 11 Sep 2010, at 12:30, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> wrote: > On 9/11/10 3:45 AM, Ed Summers wrote: >> On a Friday whim (prompted by Dan Brickley) I downloaded the 2010 >> Billion Triple Challenge dataset to look and see how many SKOS >> assertions there are in it, and from what domains. If you are >> interested the results can be found at: >> >> http://gist.github.com/574700 >> >> //Ed >> >> > > > Hi Ed, > > That's really cool indeed! Yet it's quite puzzling: I don't know what kind of bias there is in this BTC dataset, but there seems to be a strange selection being made. To take a graph we know both quite well, it's just impossible that the full id.loc.gov contained so few as 27,392 SKOS triples. Or have they captured a state in which id.loc.gov did *not* contain LCSH? > Do you have an idea? > I also have the sense that these big general crawls can be a bit lumpy/quirky. However they can give ud starting points for recrawling more specific targets more comprehensively. Dan > Cheers, > > Antoine >
Received on Saturday, 11 September 2010 10:44:19 UTC