- From: Tao, Cui, Ph.D. <Tao.Cui@mayo.edu>
- Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 09:53:33 -0500
- To: <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 19 May 2010 14:55:43 UTC
Hi, everyone, I wonder if there is any rule about using skos:note and rdfs:comment? For anything that is general enough (e.g, not example, or definition, or changeNote, etc), is there any restriction or drawback to use rdfs:comment? I think rdfs:label falls into the same situation. If there is only one label available for a class, should one use rdfs:label or skos:prefLabel? In addition,SKOS has changeNote and historyNote. We are not very clear about the difference between them. For example, if I want to stay that I added definitions to this ontology, should that be a changeNote, a historyNote, or even an editorialNote? We would really appreciate it if someone can give us some clarification on these confusions. Thanks, Cui
Received on Wednesday, 19 May 2010 14:55:43 UTC