- From: Christophe Dupriez <christophe.dupriez@destin.be>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 17:43:06 +0200
- To: Alistair Miles <alimanfoo@googlemail.com>
- CC: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>, Marc Wick <marc@geonames.org>, Dublin Core <DC-ARCHITECTURE@jiscmail.ac.uk>, SKOS <public-esw-thes@w3.org>, Leigh Dodds <leigh.dodds@talis.com>, Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bbc.co.uk>
Hi Alistair, With the Belgium Poison Centre, we settled for your suggestion. Adding icons and a "logical" order, we get this: http://www.askosi.org/image/status/ We added a french and a dutch translation of the terms. The modified SKOS RDF is available: http://www.askosi.org/example/RegStatus.xml (you have to "View Source" to see the SKOS RDF under the XSLT style sheet) I wrote to Diane Hillmann, the NSDL maintainer of this scheme. Many thanks for this suggestion! Christophe Le 29/04/2010 13:55, Alistair Miles a écrit : > FWIW, I know jon phipps created a status vocabulary which is used > internally in metadataregistry.org, see: > > http://metadataregistry.org/concept/list/vocabulary_id/31.html > > Maybe not what you're after, but I thought I'd make the connection. > > Cheers, > > Alistair > > On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 08:47:45PM +0200, Dan Brickley wrote: > >> +cc: Leigh, Libby >> >> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Bernard Vatant >> <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>wrote: >> >> >>> Hello folks >>> >>> We are currently revisiting the Geonames ontology (long overdue) including >>> feature codes, on which I would like to add some Dublin-Core like >>> annotations re. concepts. In particular some concepts are going to be >>> deprecated using dcterms:isReplacedBy, some will be deprecated altogether >>> without replace because they've never be used, and quite a lot will be put >>> in a status of quasi-obsolescence or quasi-extinction. Those are feature >>> codes used less than one per million features, which means less than 7 times >>> considering Geonames has over 7 millions features in store ... >>> I was wondering which vocabulary is the best for expressing that. >>> http://www.w3.org/2003/06/sw-vocab-status/ns is used by FOAF, Bibontology >>> and others. But it defines status as a data property, I would prefer an >>> object property with an enumerated range of individual values. Of course I >>> can define those in geonames data space, but since this is not particular to >>> geographical codes, I was wondering if there was some vocabulary on some >>> shelves I miss. BTW I was amazed not to find any "status" property in Dublin >>> Core. >>> >>> >> Yes, that is a limitation of the sw-vocab-status vocab. At the end of last >> year I started writing it up towards a W3C Note (after a 'go for it' from >> Ivan), with Libby Miller and Leigh Dodds. The effort is a little stalled but >> the draft is at http://www.w3.org/2003/06/sw-vocab-status/note.html >> >> If you think it's worthwhile, we could expand the note to include new more >> useful properties. >> >> Interested to help? :) >> >> (even encouraging us to put time into this counts as help!) >> >> Dan >> >> >> >> >> >>> Suggestions? >>> >>> -- >>> Bernard Vatant >>> Senior Consultant >>> Vocabulary& Data Engineering >>> Tel: +33 (0) 971 488 459 >>> Mail: bernard.vatant@mondeca.com >>> ---------------------------------------------------- >>> Mondeca >>> 3, cité Nollez 75018 Paris France >>> Web: http://www.mondeca.com >>> Blog: http://mondeca.wordpress.com >>> ---------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> >
Received on Thursday, 24 June 2010 15:43:37 UTC