- From: Drew <ddhunter@dundee.ac.uk>
- Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 18:40:36 -0000
- To: <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <000001ca96db$6e3546f0$4a9fd4d0$@ac.uk>
Thank you for your suggestions. They definitely make sense but I was wondering whether there was an easier solution. I had missed the fact that skos:related was a property and not a class. Could I therefore simply do something a little simpler, along the lines of the following? - (looking at the trples this produces it appear to make sense but i am not sure if the inclusion of the skos and Dublin core properties within are valid) <rdf:Property rdf:about="&base;locativeRelation"> <rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="&skos;semanticRelation"/> <rdfs:range rdf:resource="&rdfs;Literal"/> <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="&skos;Concept"/> <rdfs:label>Locative Relation</rdfs:label> <rdfs:comment> Provides a locative / geographic type relationship between two concepts </rdfs:comment> </rdf:Property> <rdf:Property rdf:about="&base;isFurtherThan"> <rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="&base;locativeRelation"/> <rdfs:label>Is Further than</rdfs:label> <dcterms:description>Relates two concept by distance - Subject is further than Object</dcterms:description> <skos:prefLabel>Is Further Than</skos:prefLabel> <owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="&base;isCloserThan" /> </rdf:Property> <rdf:Property rdf:about="&base;isCloserThan"> <rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="&base;locativeRelation"/> <rdfs:label>Is Further than</rdfs:label> <dcterms:description>Relates two concept by distance - Subject is further than Object</dcterms:description> <skos:prefLabel>Is Further Than</skos:prefLabel> <owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="&base;isFurtherThan" /> </rdf:Property> Thanks again, Drew
Received on Saturday, 16 January 2010 18:41:26 UTC