- From: Johan De Smedt <Johan.De-smedt@tenforce.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 15:55:22 +0200
- To: Georgia Solomou <solomou@hpclab.ceid.upatras.gr>, "'Antoine Isaac'" <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- CC: "public-esw-thes@w3.org" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, Dimitrios Koutsomitropoulos <kotsomit@hpclab.ceid.upatras.gr>
Hi, I have an additional question on this subject. SKOS uses property chains with xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" and xmlns:skosxl="http://www.w3.org/2008/05/skos-xl#" we have: S55 The property chain (skosxl:prefLabel, skosxl:literalForm) is a sub-property of skos:prefLabel. (and S56 and S57, similar for alt-/hidden- Label) Looking at http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Syntax#Object_Subproperties I only see object property chains. Is this a known issue ? Regards, Johan -----Original Message----- From: public-esw-thes-request@w3.org [mailto:public-esw-thes-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Georgia Solomou Sent: Wednesday, 08 July, 2009 15:24 To: 'Antoine Isaac' Cc: public-esw-thes@w3.org; Peter F. Patel-Schneider; Dimitrios Koutsomitropoulos Subject: RE: SKOS and OWL2 Hi Antoine, It seems we share the same concerns on the use of OWL/OWL 2 constructs with SKOS (esp. nature of properties and disjointness). On the other hand, annotation property hierarchies and role-chains, available in OWL 2, can offer a direct answer to some of the conditions. When you are able, you can have a look at our draft too. Once we get some more feedback and tests(hopefully) we could discuss a common proposal. In the meantime I am including the URLs of your mail as well as Peter's at our wiki page. Best Regards, Georgia -----Original Message----- From: public-esw-thes-request@w3.org [mailto:public-esw-thes-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Antoine Isaac Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 11:05 PM To: Georgia Solomou Cc: public-esw-thes@w3.org; Dimitrios Koutsomitropoulos Subject: Re: SKOS and OWL2 Hi Georgia, Good initiative! I have started a similar effort a while ago [2], but the WG had other priorities at the time. I have no time to look at your work right the coming days, but I'll be very interested to see how it compares with what I tried! Maybe we could come with some common contribution. If both of us propose a same axiom, then it's certainly valid... Cheers, Antoine [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Mar/0043.html > Hello, > > > > Me and my colleagues are working on expressing in OWL 2 some semantic > conditions described in the SKOS Reference document. In particular, we > work on those semantic conditions that are not yet formally expressed > in the current SKOS Schema. We provide a draft of this work at [1]. > Your comments and remarks are welcome. > > > > Kind Regards, > > Georgia Solomou > > > > [1] http://apollo.hpclab.ceid.upatras.gr:8001/hpclabwiki/Skos2Owl2 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Received on Wednesday, 8 July 2009 13:56:46 UTC