- From: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:25:58 +0200
- To: Alistair Miles <alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-swd-wg@w3.org, public-esw-thes@w3.org
Alistair >> CONSTRUCT >> {?x skos:minimalBroader ?y} >> >> WHERE >> { >> ?x skos:broader ?z. >> ?z skos:broader ?y. >> FILTER (!bound(?z)) >> } >> >> > > I think you would want to do... > > CONSTRUCT { > ?x skos:minimalBroader ?y > } > WHERE { > ?x skos:broader ?y > OPTIONAL { > ?x skos:broader ?z . > ?z skos:broader ?y . > } > FILTER (!bound(?z)) > } > > ...? > Well ... certainly! Thanks for correcting, this syntax is still very strange to me :-[ >> The above computing can pinpoint those exceptions. And then up to the >> vocabulary manager to figure if they are bugs or features ... >> > > This is a crucial point. In some vocabularies this could be a deliberate > feature. Hence > <http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-skos-reference-20080609/#L2518>. > Indeed. -- *Bernard Vatant *Knowledge Engineering ---------------------------------------------------- *Mondeca** *3, cité Nollez 75018 Paris France Web: www.mondeca.com <http://www.mondeca.com> ---------------------------------------------------- Tel: +33 (0) 971 488 459 Mail: bernard.vatant@mondeca.com <mailto:bernard.vatant@mondeca.com> Blog: Leçons de Choses <http://mondeca.wordpress.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 30 July 2008 11:26:43 UTC