- From: Alistair Miles <alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:34:35 +0100
- To: "'Ana Oliveira'" <ana.quirino.oliveira@gmail.com>
- Cc: <public-esw-thes@w3.org>, <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
Dear Joao Alberto, Thank you for your comment. I know Antoine has already responded, but I thought I'd add a slightly different way of looking at it: The property skos:broader represents a *direct* hierarchical link between two concepts. The property skos:broaderTransitive represents a *direct or indirect* hierarchical link between two concepts. The set of *direct* links is clearly a sub-set of the set of *direct or indirect* links. Hence skos:broader is a sub-property of skos:broaderTransitive. The WG is very conscious that this point has caused a lot of confusion. Any suggestions for how to make this pattern clearer are warmly welcomed. Kind regards, Alistair. -- Alistair Miles Senior Computing Officer Image Bioinformatics Research Group Department of Zoology The Tinbergen Building University of Oxford South Parks Road Oxford OX1 3PS United Kingdom Web: http://purl.org/net/aliman Email: alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk Tel: +44 (0)1865 281993 > -----Original Message----- > From: public-swd-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-swd-wg- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ana Oliveira > Sent: 26 June 2008 03:44 > To: public-swd-wg@w3.org > Subject: SKOS Comment (Reference WD June 2008) - broaderTransitive < > broader, narrowerTransitive < narrower > > Dear SKOS Editors, > > The definition S19 states that: > "S19 skos:broader is a sub-property of skos:broaderTransitive and > skos:narrower is a sub-property of skos:narrowerTransitive". > > I think the correct form should be: > "S19 skos:broaderTransitive is a sub-property of skos:broader and > skos:narrowerTransitive is a sub-property of skos:narrower". > > because "to be broader transitive" is a specific case of "to be > broader" (or narrower). The generic property should subsumes the > specific one. > > If my comment is correct, it is necessary to adjust the "full set > of sub-property relationships" diagram (above "Example 53") to follow > this new hierarchy. > > Best > > Joao Alberto de Oliveira Lima > > PS. This same comment was done in March'08 by > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Mar/0089.html
Received on Friday, 25 July 2008 10:35:16 UTC