- From: Leonard Will <L.Will@willpowerinfo.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 14:26:52 +0000
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Cc: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>, Peter Ansell <ansell.peter@gmail.com>, dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, SKOS <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 at 13:24:12, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
wrote
>All,
>
>I agree with Bernard that SKOS needs a property for attaching resources to
>concepts.
>
>The problem with skos:subject at the moment is this: The Core Guide
>gives the impression that the domain of skos:subject is documents only.
>But there is no explicit domain declared in the vocabulary definition.
>Furthermore, several parties (e.g. DBpedia) have a clear need for a property
>that relates non-document resources to skos:Concepts.
>
>I think there are three options for resolving this:
>
>A) Clarify that the domain of skos:subject is indeed any resource, and that
>the term “subject” is used loosely here.
>
>B) Clarify that the domain of skos:subject is documents only, and
>introduce a new super-property of skos:subject that explicitly covers any
>resource. It could be named for example skos:category, or
>skos:indexedAs.
>
>C) Clarify that the domain of skos:subject is documents only, and leave the
>task of defining a property non-document resources to others.
>
>My preference would be, in that order, B), A), C).
>
>Thanks,
>Richard
It may be of interest that in BS8723-1:2005 we have used the term
"documents" as a label for any kind of resources. The relevant
definition reads thus:
"document
item that can be classified or indexed in order that it may be
retrieved
NOTE This definition refers not only to written and printed
materials in paper or microform versions (for example, books,
journals, diagrams, maps), but also to non-printed media,
machine-readable and digitized records, Internet and intranet
resources, films, sound recordings, people and organizations as
knowledge resources, buildings, sites, monuments, three-dimensional
objects or realia; and to collections of such items or parts of such
items."
This is perhaps another illustration of the distinction between a
concept and the term which has been chosen to label it. I think that the
scope note above covers all the "non-document resources" that Richard
refers to.
Leonard Will
--
Willpower Information (Partners: Dr Leonard D Will, Sheena E Will)
Information Management Consultants Tel: +44 (0)20 8372 0092
27 Calshot Way, Enfield, Middlesex EN2 7BQ, UK. Fax: +44 (0)870 051 7276
L.Will@Willpowerinfo.co.uk Sheena.Will@Willpowerinfo.co.uk
---------------- <URL:http://www.willpowerinfo.co.uk/> -----------------
Received on Thursday, 24 January 2008 14:27:50 UTC