public-esw-thes@w3.org from December 2008 by date

Monday, 22 December 2008

• Re: Why RDF? was: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships Dan Brickley
• Re: Why RDF? was: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships Leonard Will
• Re: Why RDF? was: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships Dan Brickley

Friday, 19 December 2008

• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships Christophe Dupriez

Thursday, 18 December 2008

• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships Stephen Bounds
• RE: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships Lopez, Tamara

Wednesday, 17 December 2008

• Re: Why RDF? was: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships Alistair Miles

Tuesday, 16 December 2008

• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships/best practice role of SKOS Aida Slavic
• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships Antoine Isaac
• Re: Why RDF? was: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships Leonard Will
• Re: Why RDF? was: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships Antoine Isaac
• Why RDF? was: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships Ed Summers
• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships Dupriez Christophe
• RE: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships Rob Tice
• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships Leonard Will
• RE: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships Johan De Smedt
• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships Antoine Isaac
• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships Antoine Isaac
• RE: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships Dupriez Christophe
• RE: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships Johan De Smedt
• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships Dupriez Christophe
• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships Aida Slavic
• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships Aida Slavic
• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships Thomas Baker
• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships Dupriez Christophe
• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships Antoine Isaac
• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships Antoine Isaac
• SemAst 2009: 2nd Call for Papers Alasdair J G Gray
• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships Aida Slavic
• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships Antoine Isaac

Monday, 15 December 2008

• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships Leonard Will
• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships Antoine Isaac
• CFP: Classification at a Crossroads: multiple direction to usability, 29-30 October, The Hague Aida Slavic

Monday, 8 December 2008

• RE : Different concepts with the same label? Antoine Isaac

Saturday, 6 December 2008

• Different concepts with the same label? Sascha Kranz

Friday, 5 December 2008

• RE: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships Johan De Smedt

Thursday, 4 December 2008

• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships Alasdair J G Gray
• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships Leonard Will
• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships Antoine Isaac
• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships Alistair Miles

Monday, 1 December 2008

• SemAst 2009: Call for Papers Alasdair J G Gray

Last message date: Monday, 22 December 2008 12:05:53 UTC