- From: Alasdair Gray <agray@dcs.gla.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:47:46 +0100
- To: <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
- Cc: <norman@astro.gla.ac.uk>
Received on Thursday, 11 October 2007 14:24:47 UTC
Hi, I'm not sure whether this is the correct list to mail to, but I'm sure someone will redirect me if necessary. I am involved with developing vocabularies for astronomy as part of the activities of the international virtual observatory alliance (IVOA http://www.ivoa.net/). In one of the vocabularies which we are transforming into skos, we have the following: Planets and satellites: individual (alphabetical order) Planets and satellites has been modelled as a collection. What I am unclear about is how to handle the multitude of individuals? Should each planet and satellite be modelled as a concept? However, it would be (almost) impossible to generate such a list of concepts. So, should the individuals be in the vocabulary? What is considered good practice in this sort of situation? Thanks, Alasdair Alasdair J G Gray <http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/~agray/> Research Associate: Explicator Project Computer Science, University of Glasgow 0141 330 6292
Received on Thursday, 11 October 2007 14:24:47 UTC