- From: John M. Linebarger <jmlineb@comcast.net>
- Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 19:14:41 +0000
- To: Quentin Reul <qreul@csd.abdn.ac.uk>, public-esw-thes@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 3 January 2007 19:14:59 UTC
And so would I! Hyper/hyponym support is something that remains to be done, since our primary interest was synonyms. Since I've also included the XSLT translation files, is anyone interested in enhancing them to include support for hypernyms/hyponyms as well? Thanks! John M. Linebarger (P.S. I got a copy of the RDF sources for WordNet 2.1 from a professor from Japan at the ISWC 2006 conference, so the next iteration posted may use those sources instead.) -------------- Original message -------------- From: Quentin Reul <qreul@csd.abdn.ac.uk> Hi, I was looking in details at the SKOS WordNet made available by John M. Linebarger on 24/10/2006. As a result, I was wondering how the relations (e.g. hypernyms) were represented in SKOS. I would have expected to have found a few skos:broader & skos:narrower. Thanks, Quentin -- Quentin H. Reul Computing Science University of Aberdeen 01224 272485 qreul@csd.abdn.ac.uk http://www.csd.abdn.ac.uk/~qreul
Received on Wednesday, 3 January 2007 19:14:59 UTC