- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 21:09:54 +0100
- To: Jakob Voss <jakob.voss@gbv.de>
- Cc: public-esw-thes@w3.org, Sören Auer <auer@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
Jakob, Mark, Thanks a lot for the helpful answers. That clears it up. Richard On 19 Feb 2007, at 16:48, Jakob Voss wrote: > Hi Richard, hi Sören, > > Looks like the group of people dealing with this aspects of knowledge > organization is small so there are always the same people ;-) > > You wrote: > >> In Wikipedia, there are often category hierarchies like this: >> >> Germany >> | >> +-- German politicians >> >> Can this be translated to SKOS? >> >> If Germany and German politicians are skos:Concepts, then is there a >> skos:broader relationship between them? > > Yes - the hierarchical relations between Wikipedia categories are an > application of SKOS. > >> I'm a bit concerned that one isn't really a sub-topic of the other. >> >> To phrase the question differently: Is there a clear test to >> decide if A >> skos:broader B? For RDFS class hierarchies it's simple: A >> rdfs:subClassOf B iff all instances of A are also instances of B. >> What >> would be the equivalent rule for SKOS? > > We don't have instances in SKOS but resources that are indexed with > concepts. The rule in SKOS may be: > > A skos:narrower B if all resources that are indexed with A may also be > indexed with B. > > The point is that "may also be indexed" is a much more vague > constraint > than beeing an instance also - and it depends on the context of your > application. You may index all German politicians with "Germany" so > users will find them when searching for "Germany". But if there are > too > many resources indexed with "Germany" than it's better to select a > more > detailed concept - it just depends on! Alistair presented the semantic > model of cost expansion to deal with hierarchic relations in skos when > doing retrieval, but this is only one possible application. > > Do you know Sorites paradox? Consider a heap of sand from which grains > are individually removed. If you remove a single grain of sand of > it, it > still remains a heap - so you may conclude that a heap may be composed > by just one grain of sand! This is also the nature of skos:broader: > its > a vague property. This may scare traditional AI fundamentalists, > but it > allows practical usage with real world resources and people with real > world information needs. > > Greetings, > Jakob > > > For limited Cost Expansions see: Alistair Miles: Retrieval and the > Semantic Web, page 32ff > http://isegserv.itd.rl.ac.uk/retrieval/ > > For more about Wikipedia category hierarchies see > Voss: Collaborative thesaurus tagging the Wikipedia way. > http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0604036 > > The chapter about hierarchical relations in a student paper I wrote in > 2003 may also be of interest. Today I would not write it in the > same way > but the basics still apply: > http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00007589/, page 28. > >
Received on Monday, 19 February 2007 20:10:30 UTC