- From: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:29:27 -0500
- To: public-swd-wg@w3.org, public-esw-thes@w3.org
On Dec 17, 2007 4:22 PM, Daniel Rubin <rubin@med.stanford.edu> wrote: > Sorry, but I disagree with the suggestion that people define > transitivity for themselves. SKOS should not leave such things > undefined--to do so guarantees people will have different semantics > for SKOS properties which will prevent interoperability. I appreciate this point Daniel. Can you provide a concrete example of how interoperability would be disrupted? //Ed
Received on Monday, 17 December 2007 21:30:21 UTC