- From: LUIS GARCIA <garciala@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2007 04:07:40 +0000
- To: public-esw-thes@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF47A400DD.D35A1298-ON872573A4.00777B4F-862573A4.0078F589@us.ibm.com>
Dear Editor. The latest draft of the SKOS Core Guide has significant inconsistent references to the ex (<http://www.example.com/eg#>) namespace throughout several of the examples in the document. For example: <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"> <foaf:Document rdf:about="http://www.publish.csiro.au/paper/MU00039..htm"> <skos:subject rdf:resource="http://www.example.com /concepts#ornithology"/> </foaf:Document> <skos:Concept rdf:about="http://www.example.org/concepts#ornithology"> <skos:prefLabel>ornithology</skos:prefLabel> </skos:Concept> </rdf:RDF> I understand that perhaps there are no intentions of updating this working draft in the near future, as the latest version dates back to 2005, and perhaps someone else may have already pointed this inconsistencies out. But, although the examples are effective at communicating the purpose of the vocabulary properties, I believe these trivial inconsistencies would be better off resolved especially because some readers may find them confusing; additionally, this examples are deemed practically unusable in a real application. Thank you, -- Luis Alejandro García Software Engineer IBM - Systems and Technology Group Ph: (512) 838-8320 TL: 678-8320
Received on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 08:21:31 UTC