Re: Why not use SWOOP instead Re: Protege and SKOS Core TODO from George Anadiotis on 2006-10-19 (public-esw-thes@w3.org from October 2006)

From: George Anadiotis <George.Anadiotis@cwi.nl>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 11:08:25 +0200 (CEST)
To: public-esw-thes@w3.org
Cc: "Bernard vatant" <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
Message-ID: <36013.192.16.196.191.1161248905.squirrel@webmail.cwi.nl>

Hi Bernard

Thanks for your reply. I guess this will solve the practical issue, but my
focus was not so much on that - maybe the subject was misleading. In fact,
i could also use Protege 3.1.1 (did that in fact, and works as expected)
and not care about the issue.

Trouble is, the resulting ontology in that case will also not be OWL DL
valid - it will be a strange mixture, and i think this is the main issue
here..

George Anadiotis

>
>
>
>
>
>
> George
>
> If you use SWOOP, you have far less problems, if any, in
> importing/editing SKOS files.
>
> Bernard
>

Received on Thursday, 19 October 2006 09:08:31 UTC