- From: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 20:27:45 +0100
- To: "Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)" <skw@hp.com>
- Cc: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no>, public-esw-thes@w3.org
HelloStuart > Hello Lars (and Bernard) > > FWIW I'm much happier now that I've spotted the blank node I'd > previously missed in the SKOS Guide example Published Subject > Indicators. > To be honest I had missed it also so far. Thanks for pointing at this > I would have seen it more quickly with N3 and/or a diagram > Sure. I opened it with SWOOP just to make sure :-) Anyway, I'm not sure this is exactly an answer to your original question. You still need in this example the level of indirection we have been speaking about, since the skos:subjectIndicator is directly attached to the blank node, which is therefore a skos:Concept, not to the abstract blank subject represented by this concept. The fact that the skos:Concept in this example is represented by a blank node does not change the issue. It's a skos:Concept altogether, and is the same as (owl:sameAs) the "Ornithology" concept of the previous example if skos:subjectIndicatorRef is an IFP. Bernard *Bernard Vatant *Knowledge Engineering ---------------------------------------------------- *Mondeca** *3, cité Nollez 75018 Paris France Web: www.mondeca.com <http://www.mondeca.com> ---------------------------------------------------- Tel: +33 (0) 871 488 459 Mail: bernard.vatant@mondeca.com <mailto:bernard.vatant@mondeca.com> Blog: Leçons de Choses <http://mondeca.wordpress.com/>
Received on Friday, 10 November 2006 19:28:03 UTC