- From: Jakob Voss <jakob.voss@gbv.de>
- Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2006 09:50:29 +0100
- To: public-esw-thes@w3.org
Antoine Isaac wrote: > Sorry for breaking in late in the conversation, and perhaps answering > in the wrong direction. But what do you think of the solution that > would consist of specifying the correspondences between Bernard's OWL > hotel ontology and SKOS Accomodation thesaurus using OWL > restrictions, which is possible in the example Bernard gave (the > following can be a third RDF file, or a specification included in the > hotel OWL ontology) [...] > As Mark said there are two orthogonal problems, but having everything > represented in RDF/OWL allow to solve that in a declarative way > (well, a declarative way using RDF) and at runtime if Bernard wishes > that (provided he uses an OWL reasoner) Looks like breaking a fly on the wheel but if you insist on using an OWL reasoner (by the way the halting problem does apply if you use reasoners, doesn't it?). I like SKOS because it can be used for subject indexing without making things too complicated. Greetings, Jakob
Received on Thursday, 9 November 2006 08:49:52 UTC