- From: Mark van Assem <mark@cs.vu.nl>
- Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 16:27:44 +0100
- To: "Houghton,Andrew" <houghtoa@oclc.org>
- CC: public-esw-thes@w3.org
Hi Andy,
> situation I'm not comfortable with using that approach. After
> reviewing these comments, I think that it might be more
> appropriate to use dct:replaces and dct:isReplacedBy to indicate
> the notion of concept relocation and splitting between editions
> of a vocabulary.
Do you want to record versioning information, or stating possible
shifts in meaning? I don't know the semantics of the dct properties.
If they can be seen as subproperties of skosmap:mappingRelation [1]
then you are doing the latter, else it is the former.
Of course recording only the versioning information is the simplest
and makes less assumptions, but the mappings are more valuable. But
probably anyone working with the two versions will assume there's a
correspondance in meaning between ConceptV1 and ConceptV2 anyway.
Mark.
[1]http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/mapping/spec/
--
Mark F.J. van Assem - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
markREMOVE@cs.vu.nl - http://www.cs.vu.nl/~mark
Received on Wednesday, 1 November 2006 15:28:03 UTC