Re: SKOS Guide and owl:sameAs

Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com> wrote:

>A skos:Concept is not a class, and the domain of owl:equivalentClass is 
>owl:Class

Whereas in SKOS Core guide (http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-swbp-skos-core-guide-20051102/#secconcept), skos:Concept has been described as a class. If it's not a Class then what it can be considered as?

Best,

Nabonita Guha

Senior Research Fellow
Documentation Research & Training Centre
Indian Statistical Institute
Bangalore INDIA
 



Hi Andrew
> The SKOS guide [1], in the "Concept Identity and Mapping" section, states that owl:sameAs *should not* be used to indicate that two concepts share the same meaning.  It gives some rationale in the section for this.  Looking at the OWL guide [2], in the "4.1. Equivalence between Classes and Properties" section, I'm wondering whether one can use owl:equivalentClass to indicate that two concepts share the same meaning.  If there is a reason why owl:equivalentClass can/cannot be used for this, should it also be mentioned in "Concept Identity and Mapping" section?
>   
Yes, there is a good reason.
A skos:Concept is not a class, and the domain of owl:equivalentClass is 
owl:Class

Cheers

Bernard

>
> Thanks, Andy.
>
> [1] 
> [2] 
>
>
>   

-- 

*Bernard Vatant
*Knowledge Engineering
----------------------------------------------------
*Mondeca**
*3, cité Nollez 75018 Paris France
Web:    www.mondeca.com 
----------------------------------------------------
Tel:       +33 (0) 871 488 459
Mail:     bernard.vatant@mondeca.com 
Blog:    Leçons de Choses 




 
---------------------------------
Want to start your own business? Learn how on  Yahoo! Small Business. 

Received on Wednesday, 1 November 2006 05:11:30 UTC