- From: Mark van Assem <mark@cs.vu.nl>
- Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 17:37:22 +0100
- To: Quentin Reul <qreul@csd.abdn.ac.uk>
- CC: public-esw-thes@w3.org
I didnt have a look at the actual RDF, but your question is not clear
to me. Are you saying that there are very little skos:broader/narrower
in the data at all?
Earlier mail from John and the statements on [1] seem to imply that
hyponym/hypernym was not converted (into broader/narrower), and I
agree that one would expect those to be present. Possibly this was not
necessary for John's goals.
Mark.
[1]http://esw.w3.org/topic/SkosDev/DataZone
Quentin Reul wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was looking in details at the SKOS WordNet made available by John M.
> Linebarger on 24/10/2006. As a result, I was wondering how the relations
> (e.g. hypernyms) were represented in SKOS. I would have expected to have
> found a few skos:broader & skos:narrower.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Quentin
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Quentin H. Reul
> Computing Science
> University of Aberdeen
>
> 01224 272485
> qreul@csd.abdn.ac.uk
> http://www.csd.abdn.ac.uk/~qreul <http://www.csd.abdn.ac.uk/%7Eqreul>
> <http://www.csd.abdn.ac.uk/%7Eqreul>
>
--
Mark F.J. van Assem - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
markREMOVE@cs.vu.nl - http://www.cs.vu.nl/~mark
Received on Wednesday, 20 December 2006 16:37:41 UTC