- From: Benjamin Nowack <bnowack@appmosphere.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 17:43:22 +0100
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Cc: public-esw-thes@w3.org
On 18.12.2006 17:06:45, Richard Cyganiak wrote: >The "foo is a subject of bar" interpretation sounds odd for anything >except documents. "Buildings is a subject of the Eiffel Tower" >doesn't really work either. Yeah, I agree. Maybe there is a better way to use skos:subject in english sentences. I found descriptions of events to still sound ok-ish when annotated with skos:subject, for projects I fell back to dc:subject, but I don't have really convincing arguments for that decision, maybe because I tend to read skos:subject as "is about", but then I should use dc:subject the same way, hm. >I think for now I will just ignore these concerns and go ahead using >skos:subject. Thus, if a biography of Wittgenstein has been >categorized under "Philosophy", then I will categorize the guy >himself under the same label. > >Unless someone tells me right now that this will kill kittens. We may have to pass that one to danja then ;) > >Richard > > >> >> benjamin >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-skos-core-guide/#secindexing >> >> -- >> Benjamin Nowack >> >> Kruppstr. 100 >> 45145 Essen, Germany >> http://www.bnode.org/ >> >> > > > >
Received on Monday, 18 December 2006 16:45:11 UTC