- From: Joseph Tennis <jtennis@interchange.ubc.ca>
- Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 08:16:54 -0700
- To: SKOS <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Hello all: I hope to respond in depth to all emails relating to this issue, but I want to quickly ask a question: What is the difference between what we've called Concept and InstanceConcept and what Mark suggested as a global URI and a local URI? I want to be sure I have followed the substance of the conversation. Thank you, joe On 29-Aug-06, at 8:04 AM, Aida Slavic wrote: > >> Another solution might be to distinguish between the (global) URI and >> (local) edition identifiers. Christianity would get one global URI >> and >> two properties to define the local ID per edition. > > If I am not wrong this would also be the solution for another frequent > scenario > e.g. for synthetic schemes. > When these are applied locally they create compound concepts that > do not > exist > in the scheme of origin. Also schemes may be used with some local > variants. > In this case, for instance, global URI would be the one of standard > scheme > edition > while classification authority files would contain global+local URI > (?) > > aida > > > Joseph T. Tennis, PhD Assistant Professor Coordinator for the MAS and MLIS First Nations Concentration School of Library, Archival and Information Studies The University of British Columbia 301 - 6190 Agronomy Road Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3 CANADA phone: 1.604.822.2431 fax: 1.604.822.6006 jtennis@interchange.ubc.ca http://www.slais.ubc.ca/PEOPLE/faculty/tennis-p/index.htm
Received on Tuesday, 29 August 2006 15:18:51 UTC