RE: [PORT,OEP] SKOS f2f and end-of-charter goals

... (forgot to add the reference) ...

[1] http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core/review-2



> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-swbp-wg-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-swbp-wg-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Miles, AJ 
> (Alistair)
> Sent: 19 September 2005 19:04
> To: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
> Cc: public-esw-thes@w3.org
> Subject: [PORT,OEP] SKOS f2f and end-of-charter goals
> 
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Here is a summary of the goals I hope PORT task force to 
> achieve in time for the SWBP-WG f2f in Galway (4/5 November 
> 2005), and by the end of the SWBP-WG chartered lifetime (1st 
> Feb 2006).
> 
> We are currently in the middle of the second review of SKOS 
> Core (see [1]).
> 
> By 28th October we aim to have the following:
> 
> [A] Revised (2nd) Public Working Draft of the SKOS Core 
> Guide, reflecting changes made at 2nd review.
> 
> [B] Revised (3rd) Public Working Draft of the SKOS Core 
> Vocabulary Specification, reflecting changes made at 2nd review.
> 
> [c] A list of issues and proposals relating to the 
> interaction between SKOS Core and OWL.
> 
> The discussion at the f2f should centre around [c], and can 
> be done in the plenary session, but particularly in 
> conjunction with the members of the OEP task force (we need 
> their expertise :).
> 
> Subsequent to the f2f we begin a 3rd review of SKOS Core, 
> aiming to resolve the discussion around [c].  ([C] is the 
> main input to the third review.)  I hope very much that two 
> members of the OEP task force will be the official reviewers 
> at this stage, and that the OEP task force as a whole will be 
> able to enage and comment.
>   
> By 1st February we aim to have the following:
> 
> (D) Revised (3rd) Public Working Draft of the SKOS Core 
> Guide, reflecting changes made at 3rd review.
> 
> (E) Revised (3rd) Public Working Draft of the SKOS Core 
> Vocabulary Specification, reflecting changes made at 3rd review.
> 
> N.B. I do not expect that the work on SKOS will be 'finished' 
> by 1st february, although I think it will be in very good 
> shape.  If SKOS is to become the basis for a recommendation 
> track work item, then I would prefer that work to go on in 
> the context of a SWBP-WG-like WG (rather than in a WG of its 
> own), because SKOS work should remain in close contact with 
> other work like OEP, VM, RDFTM etc.
> 
> That's all for now.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Al. 
> 
> 
> ---
> Alistair Miles
> Research Associate
> CCLRC - Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
> Building R1 Room 1.60
> Fermi Avenue
> Chilton
> Didcot
> Oxfordshire OX11 0QX
> United Kingdom
> Email:        a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk
> Tel: +44 (0)1235 445440
> 
> 
>

Received on Monday, 19 September 2005 18:06:22 UTC