- From: Sue Ellen Wright <sellenwright@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 20:59:48 -0500
- To: kk aw <kkaw@multicentric.com>
- Cc: public-esw-thes@w3.org
- Message-ID: <e35499310511051759h3149d654ya4294c9d84815181@mail.gmail.com>
Y'all probably get tired of me saying "well, in terminology management we ..." Nevertheless, in terminology management we have terms (labels), and they can have many different kinds of attributes, among them "international scientific term" and "common name," both of which can be iterative if necessary because there can be many common names depending on region, dialect, you name it. "Preferred term" is actually a separate, different classification, which, as you note is slippery because it all depends on the context in question. But of course, this is the difference between documenting terminology for the sake of usage and documenting terms in a controlled vocabulary, where one could make the decision that in this particular reference, we will (e.g.) use scientific terms and map common names to them with a "use" reference. Bye for now Sue Ellen On 11/5/05, kk aw <kkaw@multicentric.com> wrote: > > > I think the use of skos:preflabel and skos:altlabel may be restrictive > and confusing. > > For example, in biological sciences, we have scientific name, local name > and common name for plants, fish and other living things. Which should > be the preferred name? It depends on the context. Likewise we can have > labels in different languages. > > I would like to suggest the use of skos:label with a type attribute > where the type can be "preferred", "alternate" and any other appropriate > name. > > Regards, > KK Aw > > > -- Sue Ellen Wright Institute for Applied Linguistics Kent State University Kent OH 44242 USA sellenwright@gmail.com swright@kent.edu sewright@neo.rr.com
Received on Sunday, 6 November 2005 01:59:56 UTC