- From: Ron Davies <ron@rondavies.be>
- Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 19:11:30 +0200
- To: "Miles, AJ \(Alistair\)" <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>, "Mark van Assem" <mark@cs.vu.nl>,<public-esw-thes@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <6.1.2.0.2.20050503185714.034aee30@pop.bgc.be>
Mark and Alistair, At 17:24 3/05/2005, Miles, AJ \(Alistair\) wrote: >Most thesauri are stored in a relational database, XML file(s) or text >file(s). >It is usually possible to create an RDF representation of a thesaurus from >its current representation format via some sort of automated procedure >(e.g. a text parsing program, an XSLT transformation etc.) I have no objection to the rest of the text which sounds very sensible, and gives a good example. However I wonder if it is really true that there are very many thesauri stored in XML files or (really!?!) text files. From the user point of view the largest category would probably be thesauri that are stored in thesaurus management systems; whether the RDBMS that underlies most of those would be visible or accessible to most users is another question. How about the following text instead? <quote> Most thesauri are managed in a automated system, often in a relational database structure but possibly in other formats. It should usually be possible to create an RDF representation of the thesaurus, either directly from the source data or indirectly from standard output of the thesaurus management system, via some sort of automated procedure (e.g. a database report, a text parsing program or an XSLT transformation). </quote> I think this might this be a little closer to reality. (Or at least reality as I perceive it. ;-) Ron Ron Davies Information and documentation systems consultant Av. Baden-Powell 1 Bte 2, 1200 Brussels, Belgium Email: ron(at)rondavies.be Tel: +32 (0)2 770 33 51 GSM: +32 (0)484 502 393
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2005 17:12:01 UTC