- From: Leo Sauermann <leo@gnowsis.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:40:13 +0100
- To: public-esw-thes@w3.org
which reminds me of "uri crisis" http://www.google.com/search?q=uri+crisis&sourceid=firefox&start=0&start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8 I like the idea of using http like in wordnet to identify concepts. btw: wordnet's uri rep works http://www.semanticweb.org/library/ cheers Leo Es begab sich aber zu der Zeit 11.03.2005 18:30, da Dan Connolly schrieb: > > On Mar 11, 2005, at 8:33 AM, Miles, AJ (Alistair) wrote: > >>> But I agree with Dan that having something useful there is a good >>> practice. And as he says, it is entirely orthogonal to the # >>> vs / debate. >> >> >> Yeah but, can I refer to some document that says: >> >> (1) If you use an HTTP URI of the form http://foo#bar to denote a >> conceptual resource then the resource denoted by the URI http://foo >> should accept HTTP GET requests and provide representations according >> to content-types x and y (but not z) that convey information I. >> >> (2) If you use an HTTP URI of the form http://foo/bar to denote a >> conceptual resource then the resource denoted by http://foo/bar >> should redirect HTTP GET requests to another resource that provides >> representations according to content-types x and y (but not z) that >> convey information I. >> >> ... ? If that's written somewhere (is it?), great, but if it's not >> then the 'Quick Guide to Publishing a Thesaurus on the Semantic Web' >> is defining (or at least extending) best practice recommendations, >> and I think somebody else ought to be doing that first. > > > I'm not terribly concerned who in the Best Practices WG does it, as > long as it gets > done. > > And I don't think it's essential to go into the 2 cases above in the > "Quick guide...". You already > say that you should publish an RDF representation of the thesaurus > terms; just say that dereferencing > the terms should yield that RDF representation. If you want something > to point > to, use webarch: > > " A URI owner SHOULD provide representations of the resource it > identifies" > http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#pr-describe-resource > >
Received on Friday, 18 March 2005 12:40:11 UTC