RE: SKOS public working drafts from Houghton,Andrew on 2005-06-23 (public-esw-thes@w3.org from June 2005)

From: Houghton,Andrew <houghtoa@oclc.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 08:16:45 -0400
To: "Miles, AJ \(Alistair\)" <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>, <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D53793AA582576458786FBE27899DB18EA2F09@OAEXCH2SERVER.oa.oclc.org>

I support this change as well, dcmitype:image seems better than using FOAF.

Andy. 

-----Original Message-----
From: public-esw-thes-request@w3.org [mailto:public-esw-thes-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Miles, AJ (Alistair)
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 7:19 AM
To: public-esw-thes@w3.org
Subject: RE: SKOS public working drafts


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Søren Roug [mailto:Soren.Roug@eea.eu.int]
> Sent: 07 June 2005 15:11
> To: Miles, AJ (Alistair)
> Subject: RE: SKOS public working drafts
> 
> I'm surprised the altSymbol has foaf:Image as range. The Image class 
> in http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/ seems more appropiate. After all, 
> Dublin Core elements are more likely to be known by thesauri 
> developers than FOAF.

I'd be willing to support this change, if other's agreed this was a good idea.

Cheers,

Al.

Received on Thursday, 23 June 2005 12:16:54 UTC