- From: Miles, AJ \(Alistair\) <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 14:59:24 +0100
- To: "Houghton,Andrew" <houghtoa@oclc.org>
- Cc: <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Hi Andy, Yes, this is exactly what I had in mind :) Al. > -----Original Message----- > From: Houghton,Andrew [mailto:houghtoa@oclc.org] > Sent: 13 June 2005 19:03 > To: Miles, AJ (Alistair); public-esw-thes@w3.org > Subject: RE: [Proposal][SKOS-Core] public/private notes > > > > From: public-esw-thes-request@w3.org > > [mailto:public-esw-thes-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Miles, > > AJ (Alistair) > > Sent: 13 June, 2005 12:32 > > To: public-esw-thes@w3.org > > Subject: [Proposal][SKOS-Core] public/private notes > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > b) Re the discussion of public versus private notes, I > > agree you can't > > > lay this down from above. For example, definitions could be made > > > public for one audience, private for another. > > > > I propose that the skos:publicNote and skos:privateNote > > properties be deprecated, and replaced by a single property > > e.g. 'skos:note'. > > > > The audience of a note may then be specified by using the > > dcterms:audience property. > > > > Any objections to me opening this as a proposal on > > http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core/proposals > > Currently in the 10 May 2005 draft these properties have a hierarchy: > > skos:publicNote > skos:definition > skos:scopeNote > skos:example > skos:historyNote > > skos:privateNote > skos:editorialNote > skos:changeNote > > So it sounds like your proposal is to change the hierarchy to: > > skos:note > skos:definition > skos:scopeNote > skos:example > skos:historyNote > skos:editorialNote > skos:changeNote > > I'm also assuming that skos:note will allow you to make > additional note types, just like publicNote and privateNote > did. In addition, if you want to specify dcterms:audience, > then you will have to use the second (documentation as a > related resource description) method. > > If I understand the proposal correctly, then I feel this > would be a positive change. In looking at SKOS in relation > to the DDC, we have struggled with SKOS note types, since > there are well over 100 different note types in DDC with > varying degrees of "public-ness" or "private-ness" for > licensees and translators. > > > Andy. >
Received on Tuesday, 14 June 2005 13:59:28 UTC